Why did indymedia project fail and how do we mediate these issues in a reboot #4
Labels
No Label
4opens
bug
Discussion
duplicate
enhancement
geekproblem
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: indymedia/indymedia-reboot#4
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may exist for a short time before cleaning up, in most cases it CANNOT be undone. Continue?
This is a space for new people to talk about these issues.
why you say it failed? I got so many information from all indymedia websites all over the world, during all this years.. i don't get it.. what failed? can we start on that?
The is background here https://unite.openworlds.info/indymedia/indymedia-reboot/wiki/ether-pad-archive
For me it becomes every time more clear that what indymedia needs is just small automatic cross-posting and maybe using apis/embbed to connect all different networks in a single place indymedia...
for instance... i create a new node for indymedia.. it installs:
from the indymedia gui, i would be able to insert blog posts, videos, images, etc... blog posts would be hosted in a blog federated place and taken by an api, to the indymedia website, mastodon would just send a new notification with title a little excerpt of the history, peertube would receive videos, and pixelfed images, mobilizon for the calendar and events... is not this? other approach would be to host everything in a hubzilla page, but i believe this is way more complex, hubzilla is trying to solve too much in a single place.
I don't understand the pleroma-FE approach, need more input :)
That is kinda the plan, have a look at the images.
With the #OMN we go one stage further and build a distributed shared metadata enriched data soup.
Our apps are a ladel and the internet is a semantic web cauldron.
It's an interesting project built largely with existing tools and open standards #4opens
i added this when editing:
"I don’t understand the pleroma-FE approach, need more input :)"