Update 'Looking at existing projects'
parent
606442c106
commit
7c532b69a8
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||||
Foundation funding agenders oftern have a bad affect on open projects agenders. lets brefly look at some projects https://decidim.org is #NGO process this like https://www.loomio.org this has been imposed lots of time in activism and has always failed. Formal process is a BAD tool for "herding cats" in social chalange/challange groups.
|
Foundation funding agenders oftern have a bad affect on openweb projects agenders. lets brefly look at some projects https://decidim.org is #NGO process this like https://www.loomio.org has, as offline process, has been imposed lots of time in activism and has always failed. Formal process is a BAD tool for "herding cats" in social chalange/challange groups.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Looking through https://www.loomio.org for a week and its the same ideas/workflows that were pushed onto climatecamp, indymedia and occupy in the first two case it ossified the projects in the last it was a mess.
|
Looking through https://www.loomio.org for a week and its the same ideas/workflows that were pushed onto climatecamp, indymedia and occupy in the first two case it ossified the projects in the last it was a mess.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ These #process geeks have not changed, their projects are a bad fit for life and
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Though they might work for some #NGO and more formal #coop organising.
|
Though they might work for some #NGO and more formal #coop organising.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Discushern
|
Formal vs informal - both build and use "consesuess" the #OGB is more like https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Do-ocracy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
https://activism.openworlds.info/web/statuses/106172789406318487
|
https://activism.openworlds.info/web/statuses/106172789406318487
|
||||||
https://activism.openworlds.info/web/statuses/100295941189430254
|
https://activism.openworlds.info/web/statuses/100295941189430254
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue