From 7c532b69a8264e8e510fe240b728f72c8ab6a2ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hamishcampbell Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 13:47:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update 'Looking at existing projects' --- Looking-at-existing-projects.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Looking-at-existing-projects.md b/Looking-at-existing-projects.md index 5d9e50c..9f0296a 100644 --- a/Looking-at-existing-projects.md +++ b/Looking-at-existing-projects.md @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Foundation funding agenders oftern have a bad affect on open projects agenders. lets brefly look at some projects https://decidim.org is #NGO process this like https://www.loomio.org this has been imposed lots of time in activism and has always failed. Formal process is a BAD tool for "herding cats" in social chalange/challange groups. +Foundation funding agenders oftern have a bad affect on openweb projects agenders. lets brefly look at some projects https://decidim.org is #NGO process this like https://www.loomio.org has, as offline process, has been imposed lots of time in activism and has always failed. Formal process is a BAD tool for "herding cats" in social chalange/challange groups. Looking through https://www.loomio.org for a week and its the same ideas/workflows that were pushed onto climatecamp, indymedia and occupy in the first two case it ossified the projects in the last it was a mess. @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ These #process geeks have not changed, their projects are a bad fit for life and Though they might work for some #NGO and more formal #coop organising. -Discushern +Formal vs informal - both build and use "consesuess" the #OGB is more like https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Do-ocracy https://activism.openworlds.info/web/statuses/106172789406318487 https://activism.openworlds.info/web/statuses/100295941189430254