master
Admin 2021-06-02 17:56:35 +00:00
parent 0e38c31908
commit f0cb060e90
1 changed files with 28 additions and 0 deletions

28
FAQ.md

@ -166,3 +166,31 @@ Q. Is that also true for what youre calling the “spiky” approach? That un
A. You guys experienced it here, when I came to this well “fluffy” space I was met with a well “spiky” reception. The more dogmatic liberals can often be VERY spiky were the #fahernista radicals are generally kinda “fluffy” in their actual outcomes. Lifting the lid and look at the actions, dont take what people say at face value, to see the fluffy/spiky debate in action, by lifting this lid you start to build a bridge…
Putting and holding this bridge in place is the start of power for social change/challenge.
Q. And I also think that “raising the lid” - starting to see and say what is going on - can sometimes start to build a bridge. Sometimes.
A. Bridge building between invisible world views is the hardest thing to do, but its also the most productive if the bridge can be held in place. There are strong #BLOCK ing forces.
Q. I also want to check - youve arrived here because you think there are people here who have useful skills to help build the tools you need?
A. A bit more complex than that, I have known and worked with people like this group are made up of, my expirence they rearlly if EVER manage to build a bridge and if they do its knocked down as soon as their self-interest is challenged. Its a problem that the is NO easy path to challenge/change. I dont think as a group these people are interested, but the might be individuals who are, reach out to both groups and see what I find :wink:
Q. And I am guessing, therefore, that your goal is to check that out, and see if anyone here would like to help you? Is that what youre trying to achieve?
A. You are expressing this in a way that makes little sense to me, can you think why?
Q. promoting a method of governance, based upon sortation
A. “governance” model based on a long/deep history of social movement going back to the suffragists/suffragets. Building a modern take on this classic, building from the fediverse expirence of federation as a tool for horizontal scaling of social power. Yes we do take the power out of “power politics” by sortation
We plan to mediate the last hundred years of grassroots activist “governance” in a way that works WITH not agenst this history.
The is a long history of “process geeks” coming into activism and playing a role in destroying the movements they set out to “help” - think climatecamp or indymedia as examples of this, lots of post here on this subject http://hamishcampbell.com/tag/indymedia/ or http://hamishcampbell.com/tag/climatecamp/
Q. With regard to Sociocracy,
A. Sociocracy likely works fine for fluffy middle class groups, it comes from the Quakers, have worked with them meany times and good people in their way.