FAQ.md

@@ -166,3 +166,31 @@ Q. Is that also true for what you’re calling the “spiky” approach? That un
 A. You guys experienced it here, when I came to this well “fluffy” space I was met with a well “spiky” reception. The more dogmatic liberals can often be VERY spiky were the #fahernista radicals are generally kinda “fluffy” in their actual outcomes. Lifting the lid and look at the actions, don’t take what people say at face value, to see the fluffy/spiky debate in action, by lifting this lid you start to build a bridge…
 
 Putting and holding this bridge in place is the start of power for social change/challenge.
+
+
+
+Q. And I also think that “raising the lid” - starting to see and say what is going on - can sometimes start to build a bridge. Sometimes.
+
+A. Bridge building between invisible world views is the hardest thing to do, but it’s also the most productive if the bridge can be held in place. There are strong #BLOCK ing forces.
+
+Q. I also want to check - you’ve arrived here because you think there are people here who have useful skills to help build the tools you need?
+
+A. A bit more complex than that, I have known and worked with people like this group are made up of, my expirence they rearlly if EVER manage to build a bridge and if they do its knocked down as soon as their self-interest is challenged. It’s a problem that the is NO easy path to challenge/change. I don’t think as a group these people are interested, but the might be individuals who are, reach out to both groups and see what I find :wink:
+
+Q. And I am guessing, therefore, that your goal is to check that out, and see if anyone here would like to help you? Is that what you’re trying to achieve?
+
+A. You are expressing this in a way that makes little sense to me, can you think why?
+
+
+
+Q. promoting a method of governance, based upon sortation
+
+A. “governance” model based on a long/deep history of social movement going back to the suffragists/suffragets. Building a modern take on this classic, building from the fediverse expirence of federation as a tool for horizontal scaling of social power. Yes we do take the power out of “power politics” by sortation
+
+We plan to mediate the last hundred years of grassroots activist “governance” in a way that works WITH not agenst this history.
+
+The is a long history of “process geeks” coming into activism and playing a role in destroying the movements they set out to “help” - think climatecamp or indymedia as examples of this, lots of post here on this subject http://hamishcampbell.com/tag/indymedia/ or http://hamishcampbell.com/tag/climatecamp/
+
+Q. With regard to Sociocracy,
+
+A. Sociocracy likely works fine for fluffy middle class groups, it comes from the Quakers, have worked with them meany times and good people in their way.