Open-Media-Network
/
openwebgovernancebody
8
4
Fork 0
Code Issues 3 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Update 'draft funding aplication for NLNET'

master
mj-saunders 2022-03-23 04:35:37 +00:00
parent 2fee230075
commit 97ac99ca3f
1 changed files with 23 additions and 18 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

41
draft-funding-aplication-for-NLNET.md

@ -16,45 +16,50 @@ You **can apply to compete in multiple calls** in the same round if your project
---
### Thematic call
## Thematic call
**Contact information** witchescauldron@openworlds.info
**Your name (max. 100 characters)** hamish Campbell
**Your name (max. 100 characters)** Hamish Campbell
**Email address** whitchescouldron@openworlds.info
**Email address** witchescauldron@openworlds.info
**Phone numbers** to be added
**Phone numbers** _[to be added]_
**Organisation (max. 100 characters)**
#OMN a standards based political software to build #KISS and #4opens grassroots web of trust. We do this by outlining a human understandable workflow and then building apps for real world use. We are agnostic on the underlighing technology and programming as long as it is #4opens based.
The Open Media Network (#OMN) is comprised of standards-based, political software, used to build a #KISS and #4opens grassroots web of trust. We do this by outlining a human-understandable workflow and then building apps for real world use. We are agnostic regarding the underlying technology and programming as long as it is #4opens based.
**Country** UK/ are island somewhere :)
**Country** UK/ an island somewhere :) _[Do we mention all locations?]_
**General project information**
Distilled, grassroots, radical governance is a good fit for the fediverse we are develepoing a universsatl stakonlder modeal that come from this.
Distilled, grassroots, radical governance is an ideal fit for the fediverse. We are developing a universal stakeholder model that is built up from this.
The working practice comes from 30 years of building from The Tyranny of Structureless tick box list.
From the perspective of a radical, grassroots, social technologist this is distilled into a codebase, as a “permissionless” roll-out of frameworks for social groups to form and see/govern themselves.
Based on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sortition and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle
**Project name (max. 100 characters)** OGB (openwebgovernancebody)
The work is largely based on [Sortition](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sortition) and the [KISS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle) principle. Another core aspect is that all interoperating software should abide by as many as possible of the [#4Opens](/LINK?).
**Project name (max. 100 characters)** OGB (Openweb Governance Body)
**Website / wiki** https://unite.openworlds.info/Open-Media-Network/openwebgovernancebody/wiki/Online-governance-
**Please be short and to the point in your answers; focus primarily on the what and how, not so much on the why. Add longer descriptions as attachments (see below). If English isn't your first language, don't worry - our reviewers don't care about spelling errors, only about great ideas. We apologise for the inconvenience of having to submit in English. On the up side, you can be as technical as you need to be (but you don't have to). Do stay concrete. Use plain text in your reply only, if you need any HTML to make your point please include this as attachment.
Abstract: Can you explain the whole project and its expected outcome(s).**
[Application Note]
Please **be short and to the point** in your answers; focus primarily on **the what and how**, not so much on the why. **Add longer descriptions as attachments** (see below). If English isn't your first language, don't worry - our reviewers don't care about spelling errors, only about great ideas. We apologise for the inconvenience of having to submit in English. On the up side, you can be as technical as you need to be (but you don't have to). Do **stay concrete**. **Use plain text** in your reply only, if you need any HTML to make your point please include this as attachment.
The #OGB is not a traditional top down fight for power like the #mainstreaming agenda, rather it is a bootem up grassroots fight for sharing power like meany of the 20th century social movement that created the current mainstreaming
The #OGB is a seed
“The is such a thing as society” we need to build our tools for this anti “common sense” statement.
The advantage of “governance” of the fediverse (which it needs if it is to become a part of our #openweb based society that is essential for social change/challenge in the era of #climatechaos) is that the is non, this is a good thing.
The Fediverse comes from the “cats” of libertarianism and to a lesser extent anarchism without the (O)
In this, we don’t HAVE to think how it fits into current working practices and current economics. Rather, people PUSHING these “common sense” solutions to the fediverse “governance” problems are a part of the problem, not a solution that might work.
To be “native” to the fediverse we need to use code to build “society”. Organizing for SocialHub Community Empowerment has to be anti “common sense” as the fediverse itself is.
**Abstract: Can you explain the whole project and its expected outcome(s).**
The #OGB is not a traditional top down fight for power like the #mainstreaming agenda, rather it is a bottom-up grassroots fight for sharing power like many of the 20th century social movements that created the current mainstream.
The #OGB is a seed. "There is such a thing as society" - we need to build our tools for this anti "common sense" statement.
The advantage of "governance" within the fediverse - which it needs if it is to become a part of our #openweb based society, that is essential for social change/challenges in the era of #climatechaos - is that there is none. This is a good thing.
The Fediverse comes from the "cats" of libertarianism and to a lesser extent anarchism without the (O).
In this, we don’t HAVE to think how it fits into current working practices and current economics. Rather, people PUSHING these "common sense" solutions to the fediverse "governance" problems are a part of the problem, not a solution that might work.
To be "native" to the fediverse we need to use code to build "society". Organizing for SocialHub Community Empowerment has to be anti “common sense” in the same way that the fediverse itself is.
**Have you been involved with projects or organisations relevant to this project before? And if so, can you tell us a bit about your contributions?**