FAQ.md

@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 
-
 Q. I do not see much reason to give administrators of servers so much power. I am admin myself of a small instance. That is not much work. Maybe because the users are nice; I never had to moderate. There are people who self-host an instance with only themselves. I see no reason to treat them differently from normal users.
 
 A. We don’t decide who should get the voice from each instance - this is up to each individual instance to decide in their own way who talks for them. We just use the admin check to tell if the person registering the account is a “representative” of the instance - we can open this up to mods as well. So if instances wants one of their user accounts to be the voice then they would have to bump them up to mod or admin.
@@ -8,10 +7,10 @@ The idea is to ALWAYS moderate as much POWER downwards to federate responsibilit
 
 The would be other automatic checks
 
-    was the instance online last year
-    is the instance used - check for recent posts etc.
-    am up in the air if single user account instances count - this could be an option that can be chosen by the body - I would start with default ON that they count.
-    ideas for more #KISS codeing approaches?
+was the instance online last year
+is the instance used - check for recent posts etc.
+am up in the air if single user account instances count - this could be an option that can be chosen by the body - I would start with default ON that they count.
+ideas for more #KISS codeing approaches?
 
 Then the is the human community - would then be user/stakeholder flagging as an option to question if an instance belongs. (TOS)