Open-Media-Network
/
openwebgovernancebody
8
4
Fork 0
Code Issues 3 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Update 'hdraft funding aplication for NLNET'

master
hamishcampbell 2022-03-29 15:32:20 +00:00
parent 257f4a8db5
commit 6b52c223c9
1 changed files with 20 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

34
draft-funding-aplication-for-NLNET.md → hdraft-funding-aplication-for-NLNET.md

@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ You **can apply to compete in multiple calls** in the same round if your project
**Email address** witchescauldron@openworlds.info
**Phone numbers** _[to be added]_
**Phone numbers** +4479365452
**Organisation (max. 100 characters)**
@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ The #OGB is a seed, "There is such a thing as society" - we need to build our to
Life and society are chaotic. We build tools that seek to harness rather than fight the chaos.
**[Give basic outline of how sortition will work within OGB's]** in protest campes the people who take descions are the people who walk in from the street, we use sortation (LINK) to being this value to our codeing.
in protest campes the people who take descions are the people who walk in from the street, we use sortation (LINK) to being this value to the #OGB.
A truly #openweb society is essential for the social change and challenges that we are facing in the era of #climatechaos.
The major advantage of "governance" within the fediverse, is that there is none. This is a good thing.
@ -100,11 +100,9 @@ developers and stage one rollout and testing, we will be looking for futher fund
 ** (in Euro)
Explain what the requested budget will be used for?
WE NEED BETTER WORDING FOR THIS. AND LOOK AT HOW OTHER NLNET PROJECT do wages, it tends to be by the hour I think
BUDGET 50K euros this will be paid into https://opencollective.com/open-media-network.
4 people will be paid to work on the project at a fixed rate of ten thousand euros for 6-9 months work, invoiced at the end of specific milestones. The remaining ten thousand will be used for servers, expenses, outreach and company upkeep.
4 people will be paid to work on the project at a fixed rate of ten thousand euros for 6-9 months work, invoiced at the end of specific milestones. The remaining ten thousand will be used for servers, expenses, outreach work and company upkeep.
The project team includes:
@ -120,24 +118,32 @@ has 30 years expirence of runnning grassroots social tech projects, and has a fi
* New coder to be found - programming
we need a soled "actavist" coder to widen the OMN clecctive, to build sustanabilert and keep up levels of support on going.
social outreach and testing/feedback - the project is developed as it is used.
social outreach and testing/feedback, is core to the codeing, the project is developed as it is used.
**Does the project have other funding sources, both past and present?**
**Does the project have other funding sources, both past and present?
**
it comes from the grassroots, so no, but to make it real will take some resources thus the grant application.
(If you want, you can in addition attach a budget at the bottom of the form)
Compare your own project with existing or historical efforts. **
**compare your own project with existing or historical efforts. **
Current projects https://unite.openworlds.info/Open-Media-Network/openwebgovernancebody/wiki/Looking-at-existing-projects BUT we dont have any links to back this up, its just my expirence which they are unlikly to think valed - so we have a hole here.
Foundation funding agenders oftern have a bad affect on openweb projects agenders. lets brefly look at some projects https://decidim.org is #NGO process this like https://www.loomio.org has, as offline process, been imposed lots of time in activism and has always failed. Formal process is a BAD tool for "herding cats" in social chalange/challange groups.
Looking through https://www.loomio.org for a week and its the same ideas/workflows that were pushed onto climatecamp, indymedia and occupy in the first two case it ossified the projects in the last it was a mess.
These #process geeks have not changed, their projects are a bad fit for life and a terrible fit for the #fediverse or actavisam.
Though they might work for some #NGO and more formal #coop organising.
Formal vs informal - both build and use "consesuess"
Link for more info https://unite.openworlds.info/Open-Media-Network/openwebgovernancebody/wiki/Looking-at-existing-projects
**What are significant technical challenges you expect to solve during the project, if any?
Fill a obvuise hole in our set of openweb digital tools, not repuduce the mastakes of the past. I think this last one is the hardist thing to solve.
The tech doc goes here?
Fill a obvuise hole in our set of openweb digital tools, not repuduce the mastakes of the past. I think this last one is the hardist thing to solve. take something that has worked for gennerations and turn it into #openweb code.
**Describe the ecosystem of the project, and how you will engage with relevant actors and promote the outcomes?
@ -145,7 +151,7 @@ The tech doc goes here?
we start with sub coultures of fedivers and actavisam, but rapidly move beyond this as the project UX and workflow matures to mainstram producer groups.
Stage one rollout and testing will be for the fedivers, a local street markit and a communerty group working for bike use in chisick
Stage one rollout and testing will be for the fedivers, a local street markit and a communerty group working for bike use in chisick, london.
**Attachments
Attachments: add any additional information about the project that may help us to gain more insight into the proposed effort, for instance a more detailed task description, a justification of costs or relevant endorsements. Attachments should only contain background information, please make sure that the proposal without attachments is self-contained and concise. Don't waste too much time on this. Really.