Update '01. Online Governance'

master
hamishcampbell 2023-01-10 19:54:11 +00:00
parent 7bd37f0fee
commit 47f8fcc717
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
This working practice comes from 30 years of on the ground grassroots building from [The Tyranny of Structurelessness](03.-The-Tyranny-of-Stucturelessness). This working practice comes from 30 years of on the ground grassroots building from [The Tyranny of Structurelessness](03.-The-Tyranny-of-Stucturelessness).
Social change groups have worked in this way to challenge and change power structures on the ground. Some examples of social change groups: from squats, protest camps and climate camps to indymedia, Reclaim the Streets and more recently to XR and even Occupy.<br/> Social change groups have worked in this way to challenge and change on the ground power structures. Some examples of social change groups: squats, protest camps and climate camps to indymedia, Reclaim the Streets and more recently to XR and even Occupy.<br/>
Rainbow Gatherings are a working example of this grassroots governance. They have been going for 50 years and the core is still based on the founding traditions which came from the Vietnam War - not the hippy dippy origins that people talk about. Rainbow Gatherings are a working example of this grassroots governance. They have been going for 50 years and the core is still based on the founding traditions which came from the Vietnam War - not the hippy dippy origins that people talk about.
From the perspective of a radical, grassroots, social technologist, this is distilled into a codebase, as a “permissionless” roll-out of frameworks for social groups to form, witness and govern themselves. From the perspective of a radical, grassroots, social technologist, this is distilled into a codebase, as a “permissionless” roll-out of frameworks for social groups to form, witness and govern themselves.
@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ The actual number of Voices change dynamically depending on the number of Stakeh
## What are the risks ## What are the risks
“Serving the humans trying to communicate” by getting out of the way and letting the humans work it out. While we provide structure for the Groups, we dont define the Groups. the best way for “humans trying to communicate” is by getting out of the way and letting the humans work it out. While the #OGB provides structure for the Groups, we dont define the Groups.
* Groups could be captured by agendas being open to all Body members mediates this * Groups could be captured by agendas being open to all Body members mediates this, the rule of dilution.
* Bad Group of Voices - are flagged by other Body members. When the flagging reaches a criteria a Security Group can act to reach an aggreement on these flags. If the bad Voices sneak through these checks, we have an exeptional case, where the Body acts as an admin by flagging over a threshold by a set period. * Bad Group of Voices - are flagged by other Body members. When the flagging reaches a criteria a Security Group can act to reach an aggreement on these flags. If the bad Voices sneak through these checks, we have an exeptional case, where the Body acts as an admin by flagging over a threshold by a set period.
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ If you do not want the job then resign and the lottery will pick a new person.
Accepts proposals and makes decisions. Accepts proposals and makes decisions.
Some stats for the fediverse: Some stats for the fediverse from 2021
- Population ~ 4.152.753 accounts - Population ~ 4.152.753 accounts
- Active users ~ 1.192.023 people - Active users ~ 1.192.023 people
- Servers > 6.828 instances - Servers > 6.828 instances