From 8587af928cac2895acbc19274ee2e8531b9d09f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bob Mottram Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:59:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Less wordy --- README_goals.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README_goals.md b/README_goals.md index 3df8c31d0..970779cad 100644 --- a/README_goals.md +++ b/README_goals.md @@ -54,4 +54,4 @@ The following are considered anti-features of other social network systems, sinc * Collaborative editing of posts, although you could do that outside of this system using Etherpad, or similar * Anonymous posts from random internet users published under a single generic instance account. "Spam enabling features". De-personalisation. * Hierarchies of roles beyond ordinary moderation, such as X requires special agreement from Y before sending a post. Originally delegated roles were envisioned, but later abandoned due to the potential for creating elaborate hierarchies - * Federated moderation. Again, seems like it might be beneficial initially. Share the burden of moderation. But under realistic conditions people could be pressured or bribed into giving federated moderation access, and the consequences could be very bad. Individuals going on power trips, controlling multiple instances and heading back towards centralization. Avoid creating technical routes which easily lead to power consolidation and centralization. + * Federated moderation. Under realistic conditions people could be pressured or bribed into giving federated moderation access, and the consequences could be very bad. Individuals going on power trips, controlling multiple instances and heading back towards centralization. Avoid creating technical routes which easily lead to power consolidation and centralization.