diff --git a/Online-governance-.md b/Online-governance-.md
index 122ccbb..e65026d 100644
--- a/Online-governance-.md
+++ b/Online-governance-.md
@@ -36,22 +36,16 @@ These have to be ratified through the body to become members. A few examples bel
[](http://hamishcampbell.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/GOVERNANCE-BODY_groups.pdf)
-## [Another title or not?]
+### The work flow
-We mediate the problem of sock-puppets and spammers by basic checks such:
-- Was the account created within the last year?
-- Are there active postings over this period?
- - [Need to somewhere define "active"]
-- The normal ActivityPub moderation tools
+Sign up for the site, then don’t untick the box for “role” if you become a “stakeholder”
-Upon registration, you are automatically entered into the lottery to determine working roles within the governance via [Sortition](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sortition). There is a box you can untick if you do _NOT_ want to take an active working role (opt-out - important here).
+If you are not picked by the lottery for a role there is still many things you can do as a stakeholder in the groups. If you are not picked as a stakeholder you can still put proposals for the stakeholders to make into group decisions.
-Only people who want to be part of the governing body AND play an active role are enrolled in the lottery.
-Users are just user accounts, stakeholders are mods, voices are admins, the code is the management.
+The outcome is something much more representative of the #Fediverse than we can currently think about, let alone implement.
+
+There is #nothingnew in this idea.
-Every time a position opens the lottery picks a stakeholder to fill it, if it is you and you would like to do the job – get to it.
-If you do not want the job then resign and the lottery will pick a new person.
-**[Is there not danger here of power again only ending up where it is _wanted_?]**
### The power of the voice
@@ -80,16 +74,20 @@ The actual number of voices are dynamic depending on the number of stakeholders
Basic security and checks – to see if an instance still exists and is real. If a member account is actively posting or a puppet – all of this can be done with member flagging, some automated others by people – flagged accounts and posts goes to the “security group”. It’s a lottery, it’s up to the groups to influence and as a last resort “recall” if one goes a new one is chosen by lottery.
+We mediate the problem of sock-puppets and spammers by basic checks such:
+- Was the account created within the last year?
+- Are there active postings over this period?
+ - [Need to somewhere define "active"]
+- The normal ActivityPub moderation tools
-### The work flow
+Upon registration, you are automatically entered into the lottery to determine working roles within the governance via [Sortition](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sortition). There is a box you can untick if you do _NOT_ want to take an active working role (opt-out - important here).
-Sign up for the site, then don’t untick the box for “role” if you become a “stakeholder”
+Only people who want to be part of the governing body AND play an active role are enrolled in the lottery.
+Users are just user accounts, stakeholders are mods, voices are admins, the code is the management.
-If you are not picked by the lottery for a role there is still many things you can do as a stakeholder in the groups. If you are not picked as a stakeholder you can still put proposals for the stakeholders to make into group decisions.
-
-The outcome is something much more representative of the #Fediverse than we can currently think about, let alone implement.
-
-There is #nothingnew in this idea.
+Every time a position opens the lottery picks a stakeholder to fill it, if it is you and you would like to do the job – get to it.
+If you do not want the job then resign and the lottery will pick a new person.
+**[Is there not danger here of power again only ending up where it is _wanted_?]**
### The representative “stakeholder” body accepts proposals and make decisions