diff --git a/01.-Online-Governance.md b/01.-Online-Governance.md
index afc507e..64979e3 100644
--- a/01.-Online-Governance.md
+++ b/01.-Online-Governance.md
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 ## Distilled, grassroots, radical governance is a good fit for the fediverse.
 
-This working practice comes from 30 years of building from [The Tyranny of Structurelessness](https://unite.openworlds.info/Open-Media-Network/openwebgovernancebody/wiki/The-Tyranny-of-Stuctureless---tick-box-list).
+This working practice comes from 30 years of building from [The Tyranny of Structurelessness](03.-The-Tyranny-of-Stucturelessness).
 
 Social change groups have worked in this way to challenge and change power structures on the ground. Some examples of social change groups: from squats, protest camps and climate camps to indymedia, Reclaim the Streets and more recently to XR and even Occupy.<br/>
 Rainbow Gatherings are a working example of this grassroots governance. They have been going for 50 years and the core is still based on the founding traditions which came from the Vietnam War - not the hippy dippy origins that people talk about. 
@@ -101,9 +101,9 @@ A 3 way split of stakeholders: instances/users/affiliates (builders&supporters).
 
 “serving the humans trying to communicate.” we get out of the way and let the humans work it out – we provide structer for the groups, we don’t define the groups.
 
-[FAQ](https://unite.openworlds.info/Open-Media-Network/openwebgovernancebody/wiki/FAQ)
+[FAQ](99.-FAQ)
 
-[Looking at existing projects](https://unite.openworlds.info/Open-Media-Network/openwebgovernancebody/wiki/Looking-at-existing-projects) 
+[Looking at existing projects](04.-Existing-Projects) 
 
 ## Further Reading