From 91c4839a2ded293f3e46f40afe1ef0c795b9588d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Admin Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 19:25:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update '04. Existing Projects' --- 04.-Existing-Projects.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/04.-Existing-Projects.md b/04.-Existing-Projects.md index 70897c2..6d9c353 100644 --- a/04.-Existing-Projects.md +++ b/04.-Existing-Projects.md @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ In grassroots movements, almost nothing that works, works with formal consensus, The #OGB project, is a #KISS way of documenting this by doing. When people PUSH common sense formal consensus over this they are doing damage, not helping, this should be obvuse, sadly it will not be, be patient please. -Foundation funding agenders oftern have a bad affect on openweb projects agenders. lets brefly look at some projects https://decidim.org is #NGO process this like https://www.loomio.org has, as offline process, has been imposed lots of time in activism and has always failed. Formal process is a BAD tool for "herding cats" in social chalange/challange groups. +Foundation funding agenders oftern have a bad affect on openweb projects agenders. lets brefly look at some projects https://decidim.org is #NGO process this like https://www.loomio.org has, as offline process, has been imposed lots of time in activism and has always failed. Formal process is a BAD tool for "herding cats" in social chalange/challange groups. a more ~NGO project under dev https://github.com/policykit/policykit Looking through https://www.loomio.org for a week and its the same ideas/workflows that were pushed onto climatecamp, indymedia and occupy in the first two case it ossified the projects in the last it was a mess.