diff --git a/99.-FAQ.md b/99.-FAQ.md
index 2a49ff6..49bb470 100644
--- a/99.-FAQ.md
+++ b/99.-FAQ.md
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+The #OGB project is focused on developing decentralized and autonomous models of governance for the #fediverse and #openweb. It aims to resist the imposition of traditional power structures and promote social change by involving community members in decision-making and empowering them to shape their digital spaces. The project will leverage existing open-source technologies and the fediverse infrastructure, and will balance structure and flexibility to promote creativity, innovation, and sustainability. The project has three main subjects of discussion: 1) the tradition of working activist grassroots organizing, 2) the use of technological federation and ActivityPub, and 3) original thinking for grassroots #openweb producer governance. The project is bound by the #4opens and #PGA principles and will be conducted using #KISS online tools.
+
+
 Q. I do not see much reason to give administrators of servers so much power. I am admin myself of a small instance. That is not much work. Maybe because the users are nice; I never had to moderate. There are people who self-host an instance with only themselves. I see no reason to treat them differently from normal users.
 
 A. We don’t decide who should get the voice from each instance - this is up to each individual instance to decide in their own way who talks for them. We just use the admin check to tell if the person registering the account is a “representative” of the instance - we can open this up to mods as well. So if instances wants one of their user accounts to be the voice then they would have to bump them up to mod or admin.