diff --git a/Project-txt.md b/Project-txt---online-governance.md similarity index 89% rename from Project-txt.md rename to Project-txt---online-governance.md index ad0ca30..6d84f60 100644 --- a/Project-txt.md +++ b/Project-txt---online-governance.md @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ Only people who want to be part of the governing body AND play an active role ar **The power of the voice** User proposals are excepted by anyone who has an activertypub account- just an idea – this can become a group. - User groups – a part of the process, these come from ideas getting a level of support of the stakeholders. - User agreements come out of groups these can then be enacted by the spokes people if they are interested. - Spokes people can start groups to reach agreements and can enact agreements. - Consensus of spokes people (-1) makes agreements body wide. + **groups** – a part of the process, these come from ideas getting a level of support of the stakeholders. + **agreements** come out of groups these can then be enacted by the spokes people if they are interested. + **Spokes people** can start groups to reach agreements and can enact agreements. + Consensus of **spokes people** (-1) makes agreements body wide. **What are the risks:** @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Only people who want to be part of the governing body AND play an active role ar * Groups can be captured by agenders – being open to all stakeholder members mediates this – we solve swamping by having a dynamic short non-voting time based on the number of new members in the group. -* Bad group of spokes people, it’s a lottery, it’s up to the groups to influence and as a last resort “impeach” if one goes a new one is chosen by lottery. +* Bad group of spokes people, it’s a lottery, it’s up to the groups to influence and as a last resort “recole” if one goes a new one is chosen by lottery. * The actual number of spokes people are dynamic depending on the number of stakeholders but between 3-5 is likely a good number. @@ -37,12 +37,13 @@ If you are not picked by the lottery for a job opening the is still a meany thin The outcome is something much more representative of the #Fediverse than we can currently think about let alone implement. -The is #nothingnew in this idea or implementation. +The is #nothingnew in this idea. ![](http://hamishcampbell.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/organise.jpg) **We now have a yearly voting/consensus (online) body made up of “stakeholders” ** + Who are the bulk stakeholders-representatives: One voice one instance – if you run an instance you get a vote – put the URL in as long as it’s online last year your vote counts.