From 992363fdf7da984d63ef69352eaba7acf47da598 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Admin Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 19:57:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update Developer-Path_Implementing-Commons-Using-ActivityPub-Groups-and-Hashtags --- ...lementing-Commons-Using-ActivityPub-Groups-and-Hashtags.-.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Developer-Path_Implementing-Commons-Using-ActivityPub-Groups-and-Hashtags.-.md b/Developer-Path_Implementing-Commons-Using-ActivityPub-Groups-and-Hashtags.-.md index 0c9d224..b65b7db 100644 --- a/Developer-Path_Implementing-Commons-Using-ActivityPub-Groups-and-Hashtags.-.md +++ b/Developer-Path_Implementing-Commons-Using-ActivityPub-Groups-and-Hashtags.-.md @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ Metadata & hashtag logic, hashtags act as the primary organizing mechanism. We a > [saunders]: Not sure how to go about this. Injecting hashtags feels a bit off. They would have to be somewhat separate from normal hashtag use, but then other fediverse instances would not recognise and them as normal hashtags... > But if they're intended only for "internal" use and not really for more convential use by e.g. a mastodon instance, then I think it would be fine to store them separately. -> [hamish] maybe we can use the same space but put a different symbol in front - meta data tags - the same function just added by rules not people. +> [hamish] maybe we can use the same space but put a different symbol in front - meta data tags - the same function just added by rules not people. these rule based tags will be much closer to category, but built from community hashtag flows not by directly by people #### Q: Do we need a better metadata field than hashtags? Or can we repurpose hashtags in a way that supports this abstraction?